Roomba 690 vs. 675 is a trending keyword because the 690 and 675 models of Roomba vacuums are among the most affordable vacuum robots in the market. Many people have come to accept robot vacuums as a necessary smart tech gadget to own. Homeowners are saved from having to sweep and mop their home floors, thanks to vacuum robots. Nevertheless, the Roomba 690 and 675 vacuums do not support mopping.
When comparing Roomba 690 with the 670 models, one needs to understand that the Roomba 670 is the older model between the two. Thus, to some extent, the 690 model is expected to outperform Roomba 675.
Roomba 690 vs. 675: Overview
There are quite a lot of similarities between these two robot vacuums, and there are equally differences between the two. Both vacuums are Wi-Fi enabled controllable via the iRobot’s Home App. Homeowners who have Google assistant or Alexa-enabled devices can control either of these robot vacuums with voice commands. More control options and features are locked in the mobile app; otherwise, there are just three (3) control buttons on the vacuums’ body.
Roomba 690 Vacuum Robot
* Wi-Fi enabled
Mobile app support
* 90 minutes runtime
Automatic docking and recharging
* Multi-floor support
The Roomba 690 is a smart home cleaning bot that works on different floor types utilizing a set of Dual multi-surface brushes. You need to connect it to your home Wi-Fi during the initial set up. Also, Roomba 690 supports 3-stage cleaning. It flaunts a sleek, sturdy design that would blend with most home décor. Plus, it comes with one unit dual-mode virtual wall to restrict the bot’s movement into specific corners in the room.
Using the mobile app, you can set cleaning schedules, so that this vacuum cleans your floors at specific days without manual efforts. Interestingly, Roomba 690 automatically docks and recharge when the battery gets low. Notwithstanding your home floor types, Roomba 690 can navigate through different types of floors and clean them perfectly, including high-pile carpets.
An entry-level vacuum robot that runs for up to 90 minutes is worth applauding. For an hour and thirty minutes, Roomba 690 will be moving back and forth on the floor, picking up dirt, allergen, and other particles it founds on its way.
Roomba 675 Vacuum Robot
* Edge-sweeping brush
Automatic docking and recharging
* Up to 90 minutes runtime
3-stage cleaning * Wi-Fi-enabled
Roomba 675 is a pretty-looking smart home cleaning bot. It flaunts a sleek circular design that is quite attractive and would blend with most home interior designs. This robot vacuum runs for a long time and can automatically return to the charging station when the battery is low. The bot is compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa; however, you need a device that is compatible with these assistants to activate the voice control option. Also, Roomba 675 can clean different types of floors, thanks to the Dual multi-surface brushes and 3-stage cleaning pattern.
Also, this vacuum robot runs for a long time. Other interesting features include self-adjusting cleaning head, schedule cleaning, and more are accessible via the mobile app. Setting up Roomba 675 isn’t stressful; you just pair it up with the mobile app, then connect to your home Wi-Fi.
Roomba 690 vs. 675: Similarities
There are a lot of similarities between these two robovacs; from the circular shape design to the multi-floor support, and more. Also, both vacuums lack the ability to create maps for selective room cleaning. Battery capacity, dimensions, filtration system, brush sets, and more are aspects where Roomba 690 and 675 are totally the same. Now, let’s understand in detail:
Design and Build
Both Roomba 690 and 675 flaunt the same oval-shaped body with virtually the same dimensions; however, there’s a slight difference in the body build. Also, these bots have the same weight – 7.7 LBS.
Filter and Brushes
iRobot’s Aerovacs filtration system was integrated into these robot vacuums. Also, the 690 and 675 bots’ come with Dual multi-surface brushes that perform cleaning in two stages – the first brush loosens the dirt while the second suction the dirt into the dust can.
There’s no advanced navigation or mapping system available on either of these robot vacuums. However, Roomba 690 and 675 utilize a full suite of infrared sensors to move around the room when cleaning.
Also, both vacuums can detect obstacles and avoid them while running a cleaning task. Here’s a breakdown of the multiple sensors supported by Roomba 690 and Roomba 675 home cleaning bots.
Cliff detector sensor
this sensor is able to detect when the robot is approaching a cliff and prevents it from falling off.
with the help of acoustic sensors, Roomba 690 or 675 is able to spot where there is more dirt on the floor so that it cleans the spot more thoroughly.
Light touch sensor
this sensor interprets obstacles to the bit, keeping it out from furniture, walls, and other obstacles.
both Roomba 690 and 675 come with this sensor; it is what guides the bot to the dock station without needing human assistance.
All these sensors explained above are available on both Roomba 690 and 675 robot vacuums.
Both models are controlled via the mobile app, voice controls, or the buttons available on the body. You will gain access to lots of control options via the mobile app, including setting schedules and viewing the bot’s cleaning history.
Battery and Motor
A 1800mAh battery is used on these robot vacuums; it powers the bot to function for up to 90 minutes. Similarly, both Roomba 690 and 675 are powered by the same motor.
Roomba 690 vs. 675: Technical Specifications
|Model||Roomba 690||Roomba 675|
|Weight||7.7 LBS||7.7 LBS|
|Dimensions||13.4 x 13.4 x 3.5 inches||13.4 x 13.4 x 3.5 inches|
|Sweeping and mopping||No||No|
|Brush system||Dual multi-surface brushes||Dual multi-surface brushes|
|Navigation||Infrared sensors||Infrared sensors|
|Voice assistant support||Yes||Yes|
|Filter||Aerovac filter||Aerovac filter|
|Sensors||Full suite intelligent sensors||Full suite intelligent sensors|
|Runtime||90 minutes||90 minutes|
Roomba 690 vs. 675: Differences and Comparison
There are a few differences between these two robot vacuums. The differences are so significant, anyway.
Roomba 690 comes with one dual-mode virtual barrier, which helps to guide the bot’s movement around the room. The 690 vacuum cannot penetrate into places where the virtual wall is being set; instead, it creates a bend and continues cleaning, ignoring the environment covered by the virtual barrier. Unfortunately, Roomba 675 doesn’t come with this feature.
Winner: Roomba 690
Roomba 690 is costlier than Roomba 675. Considering the technical specifications, features, and technologies, these units aren’t so different. Thus, the 675 model offers great value for the price, while the 690 appears to be costlier with no special difference. The filters, brushes, motor, filters, and many other important parts of these robot vacuums are the same. In this aspect, it is apparent that Roomba 675 wins over the 690 model because it saves you reasonable cost and still offer the same value as the 690 model would deliver.
Winner: Roomba 675
Recharge and resume
Although both Roomba 690 and 675 automatically dock and recharge, the 675 model won’t resume cleaning after charging. However, Roomba 690 will automatically dock itself, recharge, and resume cleaning from where it stopped. That’s a big advantage over Roomba 675; it saves the owner the stress of carrying the bot from the dock station to where it stopped cleaning. Auto recharge and resume feature is seen in high-end Roomba vacuums, but the 690 unit includes this feature to offer its owner a commensurable value for the price tag. It takes around three hours for either of these robo-vacs to charge fully.
Winner: Roomba 690
More accessories included in the box
When you buy Roomba 675, it comes with all the important accessories, excluding extra options. On the other hand, when you buy the Roomba 690 vacuum, it does not only include a virtual barrier unit but also comes with extra filters and extra cleaning tools. These accessories included in the box with Roomba 690 are quite important.
Winner: Roomba 690
And these are the few aspects where Roomba 690 proved its superiority to the 675 model. In terms of their cleaning performances, both vacuums are good at what they do. Click here to buy the 690 on Amazon.
Roomba 675 vs. 690: Which is a Better Roomba?
Based on cleaning performance, overall value, and features, it is quite impossible to overlook the capability of the Roomba 675. Unless you’re looking at it from the point of the benefits of the virtual wall barrier, the Roomba 675 is quite expensive compared to the 690 models.
For a powerful vacuum with good cleaning performance, great battery life, easy Wi-Fi connectivity, and voice control ability, the Roomba 675 is certainly a great option.
Features and Parts of the Roomba 675 and the Roomba 690
Accessories included in both Roombas have notable distinctions. However, both models have the following accessories and parts in common:
- Robot Vacuum
- HAPA Filter (2)
- Spinning Brush
- Cleaning Tool
- Charging Station
- User Guide.
However, the accessory that separates the two models is the; Virtual Barrier Wall (dual-mode).
The Virtual Barrier Wall functions to block off certain areas of your floor plan that you don’t want the Roomba to access. This can be an effective tool when you’re cleaning larger floors or overloaded layouts with too many obstacles.
The virtual barrier dual-mode is very much capable of blocking off a radial area up to 4’ in circumference or a liner path up to 10’ long. This will help in protecting a variety of areas including pen concept wide spans, hallways, as well as sensitive areas such as pet food areas or furniture.
Roomba 675 vs. 690: Performance Level
So far we’ve analysis the outside quality of both Roombas, how about we analyze the inside cleaning performance.
The performance level of each of these vacuums is based on several key factors, which include:
- Filtration system
- Brushroll style
- Cleaning tests
Each of the above factors functions together to establish the general cleaning performance.
The Roomba 675 and the Roomba 690 use the AeroVac filtration system. This system, however, is slightly less efficient than its successor. Regardless, the AeroVac isn’t bad by any measure. The AeroVac in both vacuums is still a HEPA filter.
The Roomba 675 and the Roomba 690 work with a bristle-style brush roll. This is unlike the rubberized brushroll in advanced models such as the Roomba 980 and 17+
However, the bristle style offers a lesser price point and is effective especially on hardwoods. Likewise, the brush roll tends to struggle with fine debris type on carpeted floors.
Motor and Battery
According to our findings, both the Roomba 675 and the Roomba 690 uses the same motor and work with similar 1,800 mAh batteries. They both have the same 90-minute operational time.
The Cleaning Performance of Roomba 675 and the Roomba 690
All of the above features help in determining the general cleaning performance level of each model.
Due to the software and hardware similarities between the Roomba 675 and the Roomba 690, we can theoretically assume that the cleaning performance level would also be basically the same.
The recent operational test we carried out on the Roomba 675 is where our research findings are majorly based. A full cleaning performance test done at Modern Cycle include 12 different tests; that’s on four different types of debris (pet litter, cereal, sugar, rice) and three different types of floors (low pile carpet, hardwood floor, and high pile carpet)
On the hardwood floor cleaning test, the cleaning performance was relatively excellent.
The Roomba 690 eliminated up to 96.5%+ of all types of debris( cereal 100%, pet litter, 96%, rice 98%, sugar 95%).
However, the Roomba 675 performance on the hardwood floor proved to be slightly better. It removed up to 99% of debris on the hardwood floor. While the total low pile cleaning performance on low pile carpet was impressive as well. It recorded 3 of the 4 tests, with a score of 97%+ (cereal 100%, pet litter 98%, sugar 70%).
The overall score on sugar wasn’t great; nonetheless, this was a fair score for most available robot vacuums. The ultra-fine sugar substance tends to be difficult for robot vacuums to remove.
Likewise, the high pile carpet cleaning test performance is almost exactly with the low pile carpet cleaning results ( cereal 99%, pet litter 99%, rice 99%, sugar 67%). 99% of the debris was eliminated on 3 of our cleaning research tests.
The only issue here is the sugar test score, which only made 66%. Again, this is not really a bad score for a robot vacuum. Most robot vacuums tend to struggle in removing sugar on carpets.
Roomba 675 vs. 690: Which is of Better Value?
Both models (Roomba 675 and the Roomba 6900 are of great value. However, one model can be better than the other depending on your needs and desires. In essence, you should get the model that fits your needs for efficient and effective performance. Go through their different specifications and functions in this article before making/ taking a decision.
Summary of the Roomba 690 vs. 675
Going for Roomba 675 will save you some money; however, you should be ready to pick up the bot from the dock station and take it back to where it was working before the battery went down. Another disadvantage of going for Roomba 675 is that you will manually remove all obstacles that may hinder its movement in the room. Click here to buy the 675 on Amazon.
On the other hand, both vacuum robots look attractive, and you can conveniently control them from the mobile app. Also, they can easily navigate under the sofas and beds. Plus, these robovacs can pick up pet hairs and other grains that litter your floor. The multi-floor support is interesting.